">

It is true that when people are considering whether to stop smoking or not, they will almost never exchange present discomfort for possible future comfort—and there's another reason for continuing to smoke. Why be nervous and tense today? Who cares about what happens twenty years from now? Heck, in ten years global warming could have a major impact and kill us all! We could cross the road and get knocked down by a bus, possibly as we lit a cigarette. Anyhow, you have to die of something. Why not have some fun today? All those were typical rebuttals of mine—and here are some of the other points I used to tick off in my mind after something or someone had challenged my smoking habit:
A good thing— score one for smoking.
You can think of athletes and coaches and actors who smoke (and you don't see them dying all over the place, do you?). People "in the know"—statesmen and politicians and newspaper editors seen on television—are invariably smoking. You can even name doctors who smoke! If they were really so concerned, wouldn't they just use a little will power or self-control and stop? Yes. Obviously then, they realize that there's a mighty difference between dropping tars from a cigarette on the shaved back of a rat and smoking a pack of cigarettes a day.
If you look back over these fairly typical responses, you'll see how nicely they cloud the issues. Even I used to have to laugh at my own excuses for continuing to smoke, and even I was amused at the fact that I could transform an AMA report about cancer in men and women to cancer "on the shaved back of a rat" in a few hundred words. So do we really ned all those patches, lozenges, gum to replace the nicotine that has us craving to light another cigarette, I wonder why it was years ago they called them 'Jack Tars' Hmmm! Perhaps they knew somehow about future medical research.
Why should we stop smoking after all cigarettes are a status symbol, aren't they?
This is based on an extract from the book "The Painless Way to Stop Smoking"